jakubledl/dissect
Tests, documentation, and a clear license make the package easier to evaluate. Its single-maintainer project also lacks a security policy, increasing the burden of relying on an inactive codebase.
43%
Total Score
33
100
83
75
Health Score Breakdown
The latest release was published in January 2013, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a package intended as an ongoing dependency.
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a project that has been inactive for nearly 10 years. This materially raises abandonment risk.
The registry lists one maintainer, which is a thin ownership base for a dependency. The linked repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, so no broader backing is shown to compensate.
No issues or pull requests were opened or closed in the last month, while several remain open. This provides no evidence of current issue handling or maintenance responsiveness.
The repository has no security policy. That is a transparency gap, especially for a parser library, although it is less serious than the project's prolonged inactivity.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Jakub Lédl |
Direct Dependencies
No direct dependencies.
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 13 years ago
- Created
- 13 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.