A single maintainer, very small codebase, and no recent repository activity reduce confidence in ongoing maintenance. The project is licensed, correctly linked to its repository, not archived, and has no install-time scripts.
55%
Total Score
83
83
83
The latest release was published in October 2021, nearly five years before collection, with no releases in the last 12 months. Only two releases exist, indicating a slow and likely stalled release cadence.
There were no commits or active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a project whose last recorded push was in April 2023. That weakens evidence of active maintenance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. This is supporting evidence of a very small project, not decisive evidence by itself.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a transparency and maintenance-hygiene gap, though not a severe risk alone.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This lowers transparency for a package handling cloud-storage credentials.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
qcloud/cos-sdk-v5 Version 2.* | — | — |
ivanlulyf/bunnyphp Version ^3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.