The project has almost no visible adoption and no security policy, increasing the cost of relying on it. Its README, release notes, matching repository, and MIT license provide useful transparency, but do not offset the lack of ongoing maintenance.
32%
Total Score
63
100
67
88
Only one release exists, published over 11 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That strongly indicates abandonment for a dependency intended to integrate with an evolving framework ecosystem.
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the repository's last push being over 11 years ago. This is strong evidence that fixes and compatibility updates are unlikely.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no activity in the last month. While this avoids an unresolved queue, it also provides no evidence of an active maintenance community.
The repository has 1 star, 0 forks, and 5 watchers, providing very little supporting evidence of community adoption or review.
Composer is used as the build tool, but no security scanning tools are configured. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap rather than proof of unsafe code.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
propel/propel1 Version ~1.6 | — | — |
symfony/symfony Version >=2.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.