infinum/coding-standards-wp

Registry deprecationdanger

The package is marked abandoned at package scope and names infinum/eightshift-coding-standards as its replacement. This is the strongest adoption warning, even though the repository remains active.

Repo bus factorcaution

All 3 commits in the last 3 months came from one contributor, giving the project a concentrated short-term maintenance base. Organization backing provides some handoff capacity but does not remove the current concentration.

Repo commit activitycaution

The repository had 3 commits in the last 3 months, so activity has not stopped, but the volume is modest for a project with an active release cadence.

Repo package mentioncaution

The repository name does not match the assessed package name and its README does not mention that package. This weakens package-to-source transparency, even though a renamed or replacement project may explain the mismatch.

Repo toolingcaution

The repository uses Composer for builds but reports no security-scanning tools. For a coding-standards package this is a modest transparency and maintenance gap.