A single-user project with no security policy and no security scanning offers limited support and transparency. The clear licensing, tests, documentation, and absence of install scripts reduce adoption friction but do not offset the long maintenance gap.
40%
Total Score
25
70
75
The package has released nothing in the last 12 months, and its latest release was about five years ago. Thirty-one historical releases show it was once active, but do not offset the prolonged release gap.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the package's multi-year release gap. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
One registry maintainer creates a thin publishing base and limited continuity if that person becomes unavailable. The repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, so there is no provided evidence of broader support.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, providing little evidence of an active user or contributor community. Popularity is supporting evidence, so this reinforces rather than determines the maintenance concern.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations and response guidance unclear. This is a transparency gap, though it is less serious than the inactive maintenance record.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
maatwebsite/excel Version 3.1.22 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version v8.6.0 | — | — |
spatie/laravel-permission Version ^3.11 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.