The README is almost empty, and the repository has no security policy or scanning tools. MIT licensing, tests, organization backing, regular releases, and a non-archived repository provide useful counterweight.
68%
Total Score
75
100
88
75
The package includes tests, which supports basic project discipline. Its 14-character README is unusually thin for a library, while the absent changelog is normal packaging practice and not a concern on its own.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. This conflicts somewhat with the recent release and push, but still warrants caution about current development activity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
All three workflows were analyzed successfully with no dangerous triggers, sinks, or audit findings. However, all six action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
imedge/web-select2 Version @dev | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.