Package Health

imedge/process-runner

MIT licensing, repository tests, and an organization-backed project provide useful baseline confidence. The very short README and six unpinned workflow actions leave documentation and build-integrity gaps.

Latest v0.3.0PackagistPackagist

58%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

50

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

78

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Repo commit activitydanger

There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a project whose last push was about two years ago and raising abandonment risk.

Package scaffoldingcaution

Tests are present in the package and repository, but the 14-character README provides almost no consumer guidance; the absent changelog is normal packaging practice.

Release historycaution

The package has only three releases, all clustered in July 2024, with no releases in the last 12 months; this is a meaningful maintenance concern.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, indicating little public adoption; this is supporting caution rather than a verdict by itself.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tooling was detected, leaving a modest repository hygiene gap.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Thomas Gelf

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
psr/log
Version ^1.0|^3.0
amphp/process
Version ^2.0
amphp/byte-stream
Version ^2.1

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
2 years ago
Created
2 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform