It has a matching organization-backed repository, MIT licensing, tests, and no install-time scripts. The tiny README, absent security policy, quiet recent development, and unpinned workflow actions reduce transparency and maintenance confidence.
62%
Total Score
75
100
75
75
The artifact includes tests, but its README is only 14 characters and provides no useful consumer guidance; the missing changelog is normal packaging practice and is not a concern by itself.
The package is about 802 days old with only three releases and one release in the last 12 months; the roughly 228-day median interval indicates slow maintenance, though a recent release exists.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers over the last three months, which weakens evidence of ongoing maintenance despite the release made about 11 months ago.
The project uses Composer, but no security-scanning tool was detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The linked repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and handling expectations unspecified.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/log Version ^1.0|^3.0 | — | — |
revolt/event-loop Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.