Package Health

ifcastle/di

The MIT license, detailed README, repository tests, and organization backing provide solid foundations. Low adoption, no security policy, and limited recent activity leave maintenance continuity less certain.

Latest v0.8.3PackagistPackagist

63%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

83

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

75

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

50

Health Score Breakdown

Release historycaution

The package has 41 releases over roughly 790 days, but only one release in the last 12 months, indicating a marked slowdown in delivery.

Repo commit activitycaution

No commits or active maintainers were recorded in the last three months, a meaningful sign that maintenance has slowed.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has one star, no forks, and no watchers, showing a very small user and contributor footprint; this is supporting caution rather than proof of abandonment.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest repository hygiene gap.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about how vulnerabilities should be reported and handled.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Edmond Dantes

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
8 months ago
Created
2 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform