ideacatlab/ancient-mail
The package has no tests or README, and its repository has no security policy. It is licensed and publishes release notes, but the single release and absent recent commits leave maintenance uncertain.
42%
Total Score
0
60
75
Health Score Breakdown
There has been only one release, v0.0.1, published nearly three years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of limited maintenance.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing the long release gap and abandonment risk.
The artifact has no README, tests, or changelog, which weakens consumer guidance and validation. The exact version does have GitHub release notes, partly compensating for the missing changelog.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these counts provide no visible adoption signal to offset the maintenance concerns.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented channel or process for reporting vulnerabilities. This is a transparency and maintenance gap for a mail-handling library.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Razvan Gheorghe |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 psr/log Version ^3.0.0 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.8.0 | — | — |
league/commonmark Version ^2.4.1 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^10.33.0 | — | — |
icsweet/swiftmailer Version dev-main | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 2 years ago
- Created
- 2 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.