The small codebase has no runtime dependencies, a clear README, and tests in the source repository. Its license metadata conflicts with the detected MIT license, so confirm the intended terms before adoption.
40%
Total Score
0
100
71
75
The package has only one release, published about 12 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk, even for a small utility.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the package's long period without releases. No newer activity compensates for this gap.
A license file is present, but it is detected as MIT while the manifest declares BSD-3-Clause, GPL-2.0, and GPL-3.0. The mismatch creates avoidable uncertainty about the applicable terms.
The repository has 1 star, 0 forks, and 1 watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these figures provide little evidence of a maintained user or contributor base.
The repository has no security policy. For a small, old utility this is a minor transparency gap, but there is no provided compensating security process.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.