The project is small and recently active, with tests, a clear license, and no install-time scripts. Its long-term resilience is limited by one contributor, absent security scanning, and workflow actions that are all unpinned.
72%
Total Score
50
100
93
75
The registry namespace and repository owner match, but both identify an individual user rather than an organization. This is consistent ownership evidence, while offering less maintenance redundancy.
One contributor made 100% of the 7 commits in the last 3 months. Because the project is user-backed rather than organization-owned, this concentration is a meaningful continuity risk.
The repository recorded 7 commits in the last 3 months, all from one active maintainer. The activity is recent, but the narrow contributor base limits resilience.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a modest transparency and maintenance gap, not evidence of a vulnerability.
The repository has no security policy. For a small HTML-generation library this is a transparency gap, though it is less significant than absent maintenance activity or an archived repository.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.