MIT licensing, a documented security policy, repository tests, and organization backing improve transparency. Unpinned workflow references and absent security-scanning tools leave avoidable maintenance and build-hygiene gaps.
68%
Total Score
67
93
83
No commits and no active maintainers were recorded during the last 3 months, which is a meaningful maintenance concern despite the recent release history.
There were no new or closed issues and no pull-request activity in the last month, while 15 issues remain open; this weakens evidence of responsive maintenance.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected, leaving security checks less transparent than they could be.
Both workflows were analyzed successfully and no audit findings or untrusted-checkout/script-injection paths were found. However, both action references are unpinned, creating a modest reproducibility and workflow supply-chain hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
hyperf/di Version ~3.2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/codec Version ~3.2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/redis Version ~3.2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/engine Version ^2.0 | — | — |
psr/container Version ^1.0 || ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.