MIT licensing, repository tests, and organization backing improve transparency. Workflow references are not pinned, and security scanning is not configured.
68%
Total Score
75
100
94
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. This lowers confidence in current maintenance capacity, although the release history shows recent registry activity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. That is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
Both analyzed workflows completed the audit without findings or untrusted checkouts, and the pull_request_target trigger has no reported sink. However, both action references are unpinned, leaving a reproducibility and workflow-hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
hyperf/di Version ~3.2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/contract Version ~3.2.0 | — | — |
league/flysystem Version ^1.0 || ^2.0 || ^3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.