The organization-backed project has a long release history, recent publishing, repository tests, and a security policy. Recent work is concentrated in one contributor, and both workflow references are unpinned.
72%
Total Score
67
50
94
100
Ten runtime dependencies create a meaningful dependency surface for a database library, but the dependencies are primarily within the same Hyperf ecosystem and no development dependencies are published.
One contributor made 100% of the recent commits. Organization backing provides some handoff capacity, but no second recent contributor is shown.
Only 1 commit from 1 active maintainer was recorded in the last 3 months, indicating thin recent maintenance despite the recent release.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected, leaving repository security automation less transparent.
The audit analyzed both workflows completely and found no high-confidence findings or untrusted checkouts, but both action references are unpinned. The pull_request_target trigger is not dangerous by itself.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
hyperf/pool Version ~3.2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/codec Version ~3.2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/config Version ~3.2.0 | — | — |
psr/container Version ^1.0 || ^2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/context Version ~3.2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.