A tested codebase and a recent release provide useful support, but no commits or active maintainers were recorded in the last three months. Workflow references are all unpinned and the repository has no security policy, limiting maintenance and supply-chain transparency.
68%
Total Score
67
100
92
67
No commits and no active maintainers were recorded in the last three months. Although a recent release shows publication activity, the lack of current source activity is a real maintenance concern.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no recent issue or pull-request activity. This is compatible with a small stable project, but it provides little evidence of ongoing community maintenance.
Composer is used for the build, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This is a transparency and hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. The tested project and recent release partly offset this, but not the transparency gap.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no audit findings or untrusted checkout/script-injection paths, but all three action references are unpinned. The missing top-level permissions block is acceptable on its own, while unpinned actions remain a supply-chain hygiene concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
hyperf/di Version ^3.1.0 | — | — |
hyperf/config Version ^3.1 | — | — |
hyperf/framework Version ^3.1.0 | — | — |
hyperf/http-server Version ^3.1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.