Usable with caveats: the package is clearly backed by a matching organization repository, has a consumer README, tests in source, and no deprecation or dangerous workflow findings. However, the registry has had no release in about 4 years and 6 months, while repository activity evidence is limited and workflow permissions are unspecified.
62%
Total Score
75
88
80
The latest registry release was published about 4 years and 6 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is a meaningful maintenance concern, although the repository was pushed more recently.
There are no new or closed issues in the last month and no merged pull requests, with one pull request still open. This indicates limited recent visible development activity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected. The missing scanning is a transparency gap, though it is not by itself evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. For an encryption component, the absence of a documented vulnerability-reporting path is a genuine transparency and maintenance gap.
Both workflows omit top-level token permissions, so their required access is not explicitly constrained at the workflow level. No workflow requests top-level write access, which limits the severity of this gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
hyperf/di Version ~2.2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/command Version ~2.2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/framework Version ~2.2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.