hughcube/profiler
The package has a clear MIT declaration, repository tests, frequent releases, and no install-time scripts. Its single-person backing, absent security policy, inactive recent commits, and unpinned workflow actions leave maintenance and oversight thin.
62%
Total Score
50
100
88
67
Health Score Breakdown
Only one registry account has publish access, and the project backing identifies an individual owner rather than an organization. This leaves limited publishing redundancy and increases bus-factor concern.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. With no provided compensating activity signal, this indicates recently thin maintenance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these values provide little external validation or visible adoption.
Composer is used for builds, but no security scanning tools are configured. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. This weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency and maintenance expectations, with no provided evidence compensating for the gap.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 hugh.li |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 hughcube/purl Version * | — | — |
hughcube/guzzle-http Version * | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 10 months ago
- Created
- 2 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.