Package Health

hufang/neozip

The README is brief, and there are no tests or security policy. MIT licensing and a matching repository improve transparency, but do not offset the long abandonment risk.

Latest v1.0.2PackagistPackagist

38%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

0

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

71

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

The package has only 2 releases, both in January 2019, and none in the last 12 months; the latest release is about 7 years old. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk.

Repo commit activitydanger

The repository recorded 0 commits and 0 active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the package's long release gap and indicating no observed maintenance.

Package file treecaution

The artifact and repository each contain only 5 files, including one source file, which limits project complexity but also provides little evidence of ongoing engineering support.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has 2 stars, 1 fork, and 0 watchers. Low popularity is only supporting evidence, but it offers little community signal to offset the lack of maintenance.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer is used for the build, which fits the package ecosystem, but no security scanning tools are present. The missing scanning is a modest hygiene gap rather than a standalone severe risk.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

hufang

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
7 years ago
Created
7 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform