The MIT license, matching repository, release notes, and security scanning provide useful transparency. The small project has had no commits in the last three months, while all workflow actions are unpinned and a high-confidence template-injection issue needs attention.
62%
Total Score
50
100
94
67
The package and repository are owned by the same individual, so ownership is consistent, though it does not provide organization-level backing.
The package is over two years old with six releases and one release in the last 12 months; this shows continued publishing but a modest cadence.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, a concrete sign of currently quiet maintenance capacity.
The repository has no SECURITY.md policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented for users.
The only workflow is fully analyzed and has no untrusted checkout or script-injection trigger, but all three action references are unpinned and a high-confidence template-injection finding remains. The workflow uses job-level rather than broad top-level permissions, which partly offsets the concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
laravel/pulse Version ^1.4 | — | — |
laravel/framework Version ^10.48.4|^11.0.8|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.