Tests, changelog, release notes, and a recent push provide useful project evidence. The missing package README and six unpinned workflow actions reduce transparency and build reproducibility, while organization backing helps offset the single-contributor concentration.
78%
Total Score
83
88
50
The artifact includes tests and a changelog, and this version has GitHub release notes; those provide strong maintenance and change-history evidence. The package lacks a README, which is a minor documentation gap for a library.
All 3 recent commits came from one contributor, leaving no demonstrated contributor redundancy. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, but the observed activity remains concentrated.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tool was detected. That is a meaningful repository hygiene gap, though it does not by itself indicate abandonment.
The repository has no security policy, reducing clarity about vulnerability reporting and response. This is a transparency weakness rather than a severe dependency risk on its own.
Both workflows were analyzed successfully with no untrusted checkouts, script injection, or high-severity findings, and permissions are not broadly writable. However, 6 of 7 action references are unpinned, weakening build reproducibility.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.