Usable with caveats: it has frequent recent releases, a matching organization-backed repository, tests, and clear licensing. Maintenance is concentrated in one contributor, with only three commits in three months and no security policy.
72%
Total Score
70
100
100
80
All three recent commits came from one contributor, creating a concentrated maintenance risk; organization backing provides some capacity to hand work off but no second active contributor is shown.
The repository had three commits in the last three months, so activity is present but relatively light for a recently released package.
There are six open pull requests but no pull requests were merged in the last month, suggesting some unresolved contribution backlog despite no open issues.
No security policy is present, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
The workflow has no top-level token permissions declaration. Although no write permissions were detected, explicitly limiting permissions would provide stronger CI hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
helsingborg-stad/wpservice Version ^2.0 | — | — |
helsingborg-stad/acfservice Version ^1.0 | — | — |
helsingborg-stad/wputilservice Version ^0.2.44 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.