Usable with caveats: it has frequent stable releases, clear licensing, and an active unarchived project, but the source repository shows no commits or active maintainers in the last three months. Automated releases, no tests or changelog, and incomplete workflow permission declarations reduce transparency.
68%
Total Score
75
100
88
75
A README explains the package and its automated generation process, but neither the artifact nor repository has tests or a changelog. For a generated IDE helper this is a transparency gap, although the README documents its purpose and workflow.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. This is a meaningful maintenance concern, even though the registry shows frequent releases that appear largely automated.
The repository has 9 stars, 0 forks, and 1 watcher. This indicates a small user and contributor base, but popularity is supporting evidence rather than a decisive health measure.
No security policy is present. This limits the project's documented process for reporting and handling vulnerabilities, though it is a smaller concern for a narrowly scoped generated helper.
The only workflow lacks top-level token permissions, so its required access is not explicitly minimized. No top-level write permissions were detected, which limits the severity of this hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
phpstan/phpstan Version ^2.2.14 | — | — |
phpstan/php-8-stubs Version 0.4.37 | — | — |
phpstan/phpdoc-parser Version 2.3.5 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.