Tests, a changelog, release notes, and a matching repository provide useful transparency. MIT licensing and no install scripts reduce adoption friction, though the project lacks a security policy.
72%
Total Score
50
100
94
75
The repository is owned by a user account rather than an organization, so the concentrated maintainer activity is not offset by visible organizational backing.
One contributor made all nine recent commits, creating a concentrated maintenance dependency with no demonstrated handoff capacity.
Nine commits in the last three months show recent work, but all activity comes from one maintainer, limiting evidence of sustained maintenance capacity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tool was detected, leaving security-process maturity unconfirmed.
The repository has no security policy, which makes vulnerability reporting and response expectations less transparent for a package handling comments and moderation.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
happytodev/blogr Version * | — | — |
filament/filament Version ^5.0 | — | — |
laravel/framework Version ^13.0 | — | — |
league/commonmark Version ^2.6 | — | — |
scrivo/highlight.php Version ^9.18 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.