Package Health

habeuk/layout_custom_style

The single maintainer and absent security controls leave limited resilience. MIT licensing, stable versioning, low runtime dependency count, and recent releases provide useful counterweight.

Latest 1.3.1PackagistPackagist

65%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

67

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

90

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

50

Health Score Breakdown

Maintainerscaution

Only one registry publishing account is listed, which creates continuity risk. The organization-owned repository provides some backing, but it does not demonstrate a broader active maintainer base.

Repo commit activitycaution

The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, despite a recent registry release. This weakens confidence in ongoing source maintenance.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer is used for build tooling, but no security scanning tools are present. This is a transparency and maintenance gap, though not a severe risk on its own.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This lowers maintenance transparency for a package intended for application integration.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

kouwa stephane

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
drupal/generate_style_theme
Version dev-3x|^3.0.1|4.x-dev|^4.0|^5.0|5.x-dev

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
7 months ago
Created
2 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform