gustav/cache
The license files disagree, and the repository has no security policy or security scanning. Tests, documentation, and a matching organization-backed repository provide useful transparency, but they do not offset the maintenance concern.
41%
Total Score
50
71
83
Health Score Breakdown
The latest release was about six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a library dependency.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers over the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and leaving current maintenance unconfirmed.
The package declares GPLv3, while the artifact license file is detected as LGPL-3.0. License files are present, but the mismatch creates a real licensing ambiguity for adopters.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools are configured. That leaves dependency and code-risk checks less visible.
The repository has no security policy, which reduces transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities. This is a hygiene gap rather than evidence of a security defect.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Chris Köcher |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 psr/cache Version ^1.0 | — | — |
gustav/utils Version ^0.1 | — | — |
psr/simple-cache Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 6 years ago
- Created
- 11 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.