The package is well documented, licensed, tested in its repository, and published without install-time scripts. The absence of security scanning and unpinned workflow actions add hygiene risk, while the long publication silence limits confidence in ongoing support.
46%
Total Score
25
88
75
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the release history showing no release for over two years. This is a material maintenance and abandonment concern.
The registry namespace and repository are owned by the same individual account, so the package does not show organization backing that would compensate for its thin recent activity.
The package has 49 releases but none in the last 12 months, and its latest release was published over two years ago. This strongly reduces confidence that current regulatory or dependency changes will be addressed.
The repository uses Composer, but no security scanning tools were detected. The build setup is present, though security-process transparency is limited.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or coordinating vulnerability fixes. This is a transparency gap, especially for software handling electronic invoices and certificates.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nfephp-org/sped-gtin Version ^1.1.0 | — | — |
nfephp-org/sped-common Version ^5.1.0 | — | — |
justinrainbow/json-schema Version ^5.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.