Two contributors are active, security tooling and a security policy are present, and the workflows are fully audited with pinned actions. The single broad write permission is a minor hygiene concern without an untrusted trigger or injection finding.
78%
Total Score
67
100
94
67
A post-autoload-dump install lifecycle script is present, creating some execution surface during installation. No accompanying signal shows that it is unsafe, so this is only a minor consideration.
The repository is owned by a user account rather than an organization, so the small active contributor base offers limited visible institutional backing.
The package is only 39 days old with two releases, so its long-term maintenance record is still unproven. The latest release was recent and the repository shows activity, which partly offsets the limited history.
Two contributors are active, with the leading contributor responsible for two of three recent commits. The second contributor provides some handoff capacity, but the base remains small.
Both workflows were analyzed successfully, all five action references are pinned, and no injection or untrusted-checkout findings were reported. One workflow grants top-level write permission, a mild hygiene concern without an unsafe trigger or sink.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/support Version ^12.0||^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.