groupdocscloud/groupdocs-comparison-cloud
It has a long release history, a stable version, tests, a clear MIT license, and organization backing. The package is well structured, but its small public footprint and limited security practices leave less independent evidence for long-term support.
68%
Total Score
75
100
81
50
Health Score Breakdown
The package has existed since 2018, but only two releases appeared in the last 12 months and the median interval is about 225 days. This indicates deliberate rather than frequent maintenance, with some abandonment risk.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months. Although the release was recently published, the lack of observed development activity weakens confidence in ongoing maintenance.
The repository has zero stars, one fork, and three watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these low figures provide little independent evidence of adoption or community support.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. That is a meaningful maintenance and transparency gap for a dependency distributed to users.
The repository has no security policy. This does not show a vulnerability, but it leaves reporting and maintenance expectations less transparent.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 GroupDocs |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^6.5.8|^7.4.5 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 3 months ago
- Created
- 8 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.