Common implementation for retrying operations
66%
Total Score
50
100
89
75
Only one registry account has publish access, leaving limited visible publishing redundancy. The linked repository is user-owned rather than organization-owned, so there is no provided evidence of broader organizational backing.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, while the latest release was about 7 months ago. That quiet period raises abandonment risk despite the earlier releases.
The repository has zero stars and one fork. This is weak supporting evidence of adoption, but popularity alone does not outweigh the package's documentation and tests.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool is configured. That is a transparency and maintenance-hygiene gap rather than evidence of an unsafe release.
The repository has no security policy. For a library handling retries around HTTP, RPC, queues, and databases, this weakens the documented process for reporting and handling vulnerabilities.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/log Version ^1 || ^2 || ^3 | — | — |
psr/clock Version ^1.0 | — | — |
gohany/retry Version ^1.0 | — | — |
psr/http-message Version ^1.0 || ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.