Package Health

gipfl/process

Its small, focused file set and organization-owned repository keep the maintenance burden understandable. The missing README, absent security policy, and lack of security scanning reduce transparency for consumers, despite a declared MIT license and no install-time scripts.

Latest v0.5.0PackagistPackagist

61%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

75

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

75

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Release historycaution

The package has had five releases since October 2021, but none in the last two years; this suggests a slowing maintenance cycle for a dependency that may still need fixes.

Repo commit activitycaution

There were no commits or active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and raising abandonment risk.

Repo toolingcaution

The project uses Composer, but no security scanning tools were detected; that is a modest transparency and maintenance gap.

Security policycaution

The linked repository has no security policy, leaving no documented path for reporting vulnerabilities or handling security fixes.

Version stabilitycaution

Version v0.5.0 is not a stable major release, so its API may still change, although it is not marked as a prerelease.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Thomas Gelf

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
gipfl/json
Version >=0.1
react/promise
Version >=2
gipfl/linux-health
Version >=0.2
react/child-process
Version >=0.6

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
2 years ago
Created
4 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform