The repository has no security policy or scanning, leaving weaker transparency around maintenance practices. Organization backing, a matching repository, a license, and a usable README provide some support, but the project appears effectively abandoned.
42%
Total Score
50
100
75
75
This package has had only one release, published about five years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. No provided maintenance signal compensates for this inactivity.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, offering little evidence of active community adoption or review. Popularity is supporting evidence, so this reinforces but does not independently determine the score.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. The lack of scanning adds a modest maintenance and transparency concern.
No security policy was found, reducing transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities. This is a meaningful hygiene gap for a module that stores and encrypts customer documents.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
magento/framework Version * | — | — |
ghostunicorns/module-docs Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.