Frequent releases and recent commits show active maintenance, with organization backing and a shared contributor base. Workflows leave all six actions unpinned and install a package outside a lockfile. The SDK has extensive documentation, tests, and no install-time scripts.
58%
Total Score
100
100
75
67
The manifest declares Unlicense while the artifact and repository license file are detected as MIT. A license is present, but the conflicting declarations create uncertainty about the release's applicable terms.
The repository name does not match the package name, and its README does not mention the package, so the package-to-source relationship is not transparent. The generated SDK documentation identifies Zernio instead, which only partly explains the mismatch.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency gap for reporting vulnerabilities, though it does not by itself show that maintenance has stopped.
Version 0.0.857 is not on a stable major version, so compatibility expectations are limited. It is not a prerelease and recent prerelease share is 0%, which partly offsets that concern.
Both workflows were analyzed without trigger or script-injection risks, and one scopes permissions at job level. However, all six action references are unpinned and a high-confidence finding reports an ad hoc package installation outside a lockfile, weakening build reproducibility.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
guzzlehttp/psr7 Version ^1.7 || ^2.0 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.