geocurly/easy-benchmark

The package has a clear README, an MIT declaration, a small runtime dependency surface, and no install-time scripts. Its limited project tooling and lack of tests or security scanning leave little support for long-term maintenance.

Latest 0.1.1

Packagist

42%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

The package has had only two releases, with no release in nearly six years and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a library that may need compatibility or bug fixes.

Repo commit activity

There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the old last push, this indicates that maintenance capacity is currently absent.

Project backing

The repository is owned by an individual user rather than an organization. That is ordinary for a small package, but it provides no visible organizational maintenance capacity to offset the inactive history.

Repo popularity

The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher. Low popularity is supporting evidence of limited adoption, but it is not decisive by itself.

Repo tooling

Composer is used for the build, which fits the package ecosystem, but no security scanning tools are configured. The missing scanning is a modest transparency and maintenance concern.