Recent releases, a matching repository, tests, and a clear MIT license support continued use. Maintenance activity has been quiet for three months, while the workflow uses two unpinned actions and lacks a security policy.
73%
Total Score
75
100
94
75
No commits and no active maintainers were recorded in the last three months. The recent release and push partly offset this, but the short-term maintenance signal remains weaker than the release history.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest transparency and hygiene gap.
The repository has no security policy, so vulnerability reporting and response expectations are less clear.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers or audit findings, but both action references are unpinned. The absence of a top-level permissions block is acceptable on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/http-message Version ~1.0 || ~2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.