gemini-d/plt-common
MIT licensing, repository tests, and organization backing provide a solid baseline. Workflow dependencies are unpinned and one referenced action is archived, so maintenance overhead remains.
52%
Total Score
75
83
50
Health Score Breakdown
The latest release was over two years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. Only three releases exist, which lowers confidence in ongoing maintenance.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and increasing abandonment risk.
The repository has no stars or forks and only one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but this offers little external adoption evidence.
The project uses Composer for builds, but no security-scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest repository hygiene gap.
No security policy was found in the repository, reducing transparency for vulnerability reporting and response.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
No maintainer information available.
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 hyperf/event Version ^3.1 | — | — |
hyperf/config Version ^3.1 | — | — |
hyperf/support Version ^3.1 | — | — |
hyperf/framework Version ^3.1 | — | — |
hyperf/rpc-multiplex Version ^3.1 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 2 years ago
- Created
- 2 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.