Tests, a GitHub release, and a small dependency set provide some structure. The proprietary license, absent security policy, and unpinned workflow reference reduce transparency and build confidence.
38%
Total Score
0
100
67
75
The package has only one release, published nearly seven years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a dependency intended to receive maintenance.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and leaving current maintenance capacity un demonstrated.
The manifest declares a proprietary license, and no license file was found. That creates a material adoption and redistribution concern for an open-source dependency.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher. Popularity is not decisive, but these counters provide no supporting evidence of a broader maintenance or review community.
The repository has no security policy, so there is no documented channel or process for reporting vulnerabilities. This is a transparency gap, though it is less severe than the maintenance evidence.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
symfony/property-access Version ^5.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.