The MIT license, matching repository, and clear 30-file source tree improve transparency. A single registry maintainer and no security policy leave little evidence of ongoing support; pin it only if its static template still fits your needs.
42%
Total Score
50
78
75
Only two releases were published, with the latest about 9 years ago and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of a dormant package, although a static template may need fewer releases than an active library.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. Combined with the long time since the last release, this materially raises abandonment risk.
One registry maintainer is a thin publishing base, increasing continuity risk, though the repository is owned by an organization.
The repository has 0 stars and 2 forks. This is weak supporting evidence, but popularity alone is not decisive for a small template.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tooling was detected. For a small static template this is a minor hygiene limitation rather than a severe dependency risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.