The README is substantial, the release has notes, and the repository is not archived. Its small audience, absent security policy, and unpinned workflow references leave less evidence of ongoing care.
52%
Total Score
75
69
67
The manifest declares GPL-3.0-or-later and MIT, and a LICENSE file is present with GPL-3.0 detected; the repository also has a license file. The release is licensed, though the differing declared and detected names warrant checking the exact intended terms.
Only four releases exist, with none in the last 12 months and the latest release about 22 months ago. This points to materially reduced maintenance activity, though it does not prove abandonment.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the lack of recent releases, this is a meaningful maintenance concern.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these counters provide no community signal to offset the quiet maintenance record.
Composer is used for the build, but no security scanning tools are present. This weakens automated oversight, though it is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the release is unsafe by itself.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
metaregistrar/rdap-client Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.