forska/think-library
MIT licensing and no install scripts reduce adoption friction. The repository contains the expected source tree, but its brief documentation and absent security policy leave limited transparency for maintainers.
38%
Total Score
0
67
75
Health Score Breakdown
The latest release was in September 2021, with no releases in the last 12 months and only seven releases overall. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the release history showing several years without updates.
The repository name matches the package, reducing the risk of an unrelated source repository, but the README does not mention the package. That weakens package-to-source traceability.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is not decisive, but this provides little supporting evidence of community adoption or review.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities. This matters more for a reusable web application library.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 forska |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 topthink/framework Version 5.0.* | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 5 years ago
- Created
- 5 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.