Tests, an MIT license, and organization backing provide a solid foundation. The limited release history and inactive recent commit window make long-term maintenance less certain, while workflow pinning remains weak.
61%
Total Score
75
88
67
Only two releases have been published, with the latest on January 23, 2023 and none in the last 12 months. This is a meaningful maintenance concern, though the repository was pushed more recently.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the three months measured. This weakens evidence of current maintenance, although the repository was not archived.
Composer and Make are used for project tooling, but no security-scanning tool was detected. The missing scanner is a modest transparency gap rather than evidence of unsafe code.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap, but it is partly offset by the small, tested package scope.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous findings or untrusted checkouts. However, all three action references are unpinned, weakening reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.