Tests, a README, MIT licensing, and organization backing provide useful project context. The workflow has three unpinned actions and the repository lacks a security policy, so maintenance hygiene is limited.
61%
Total Score
75
88
75
The package has only one release, published about 2 years and 8 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This materially raises abandonment risk despite the stable 1.0.0 version.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with a repository whose latest observed push is nearly 2 years old. This is a meaningful maintenance concern.
The repository uses Make and Composer, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This lowers transparency for a package intended as a reusable library.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no trigger or audit findings, but all 3 action references are unpinned. The absence of a top-level permissions block is acceptable on its own, while unpinned actions remain a supply-chain hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spryker/carts-rest-api Version ^5.0.0 | — | — |
spryker/glossary-storage Version ^1.0.0 | — | — |
spryker/glue-application Version ^1.0.0 | — | — |
fond-of-impala/company-user-carts-rest-api Version ^1.0.0 | — | — |
fond-of-impala/allowed-product-quantity-cart-connector Version ^1.0.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.