folk/symfony
MIT licensing and focused dependencies make adoption straightforward. Tests, balanced contributor activity, and organizational ownership add useful confidence, while workflow pinning and security documentation remain limited.
76%
Total Score
100
100
79
75
Health Score Breakdown
The artifact includes tests and the repository also has tests, which supports maintainability. No README is present for this integration library, leaving consumers with less documented guidance.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected, leaving a modest repository hygiene gap.
The repository has no security policy, which makes vulnerability reporting and coordinated disclosure less transparent.
v0.2.4 is not a prerelease, but it remains in the 0.x major range, so its API maturity is still limited despite the absence of recent prerelease versions.
Both workflows were analyzed without high-confidence audit findings or untrusted triggers, but all 2 of 2 action references are unpinned, so their versions can change unexpectedly.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Folk Contributors |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 folk/sdk Version ^0.4.1 | — | — |
symfony/http-kernel Version ^6.4|^7.0|^8.0 | — | — |
symfony/http-foundation Version ^6.4|^7.0|^8.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 1 month ago
- Created
- 3 months ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.