Documentation, tests, and a changelog make adoption easier. The single-contributor maintenance model and unpinned workflow actions leave meaningful continuity and build-integrity concerns.
68%
Total Score
83
100
50
All 25 recent commits came from one contributor, so maintenance depends heavily on a single individual despite the organization-owned repository.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting and handling security issues.
The audit covered both workflows and found no untrusted checkout or script-injection paths, but all six action references are unpinned, reducing build reproducibility and update control.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
twig/twig Version ^3.0 | — | — |
filp/whoops Version ^2.18 | — | — |
spatie/image Version ^1.10 || ^2.0 || ^3.0 | — | — |
wp-cli/wp-cli Version ^2.12 | — | — |
jgrossi/corcel Version ^9.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.