The package is MIT-licensed, documented, tested, and backed by an organization, with a small and reasonable dependency set. Its workflow uses unpinned actions and the repository has no security policy, adding modest transparency and reproducibility concerns.
58%
Total Score
67
100
75
75
The package has had only two releases, with the latest released about 5 years and 7 months ago and none in the last 12 months. This long period without releases raises maintenance and compatibility risk.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. Combined with the old latest release, this indicates little current maintenance activity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest repository hygiene gap rather than evidence that the release is unsafe.
The linked repository is not archived, although its last push was about 2 years and 10 months ago. The active repository status is reassuring, but the old push date does not offset the broader maintenance concern.
The repository has no security policy. That weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency, although it is a smaller concern than the lack of recent maintenance.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/cache Version ^2.0 | ^3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.