The single-release history and inactive recent commit record leave little evidence of ongoing support. A matching repository with tests and a declared MIT license helps, but the project has limited adoption and no security policy.
58%
Total Score
50
83
75
The package and repository are owned by the same individual account, providing consistent ownership context but no organizational backing or larger maintainer base.
This package has only one release, published about 5 years and 8 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That provides limited evidence of ongoing maintenance.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. Combined with the repository's last push about 3 years ago, this is meaningful evidence of inactive maintenance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, indicating very limited visible adoption. Popularity is supporting evidence, but this reinforces the maintenance uncertainty rather than deciding it alone.
The repository uses Composer, providing ordinary build tooling, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a modest transparency gap, not evidence that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nesbot/carbon Version ^2.31 | — | — |
illuminate/log Version ^8.0 | — | — |
symfony/finder Version 5.1.4 | — | — |
illuminate/mail Version ^8.0 | — | — |
illuminate/view Version ^8.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.