Package Health

faruk/commander

The MIT license, tests, and lack of install-time scripts are positive. Long-term maintenance looks unreliable, so adopting it creates avoidable dependency risk.

Latest 1.0PackagistPackagist

32%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

50

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

60

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

The package has only one release, published over 11 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment risk.

Package scaffoldingcaution

Tests are present, which is a positive for basic project maturity, but the published package has no README, leaving consumers without documented integration guidance.

Repo issue activitycaution

There has been no issue or pull-request activity in the last month. With no recent releases, this supports a broader pattern of inactivity.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is not decisive, but this provides little supporting evidence of adoption or maintenance.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and maintenance gap, although it is less significant than the package's prolonged inactivity.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Faruk Hopic

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
illuminate/support
Version 4.2.*
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
11 years ago
Created
11 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform