The MIT license and absence of install-time scripts are reassuring. Missing consumer documentation and a security policy leave transparency weaker than established packages.
55%
Total Score
67
83
75
The release has no README, which is a real documentation gap for a library consumers must integrate. Missing tests and changelog files are normal packaging practice and do not lower the score here.
This release is the package's only release, published 42 days ago, so there is not yet enough history to demonstrate sustained maintenance. The recent publication is better than an abandoned older release, but maturity remains unproven.
One contributor made 100% of the two recent commits, creating a concentrated maintenance risk. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is shown.
The repository has only 2 commits in the last 3 months and one active maintainer. That shows some recent activity, but not a strong maintenance cadence.
The linked repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about vulnerability reporting and handling. This is a modest concern rather than evidence of unsafe code.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nesbot/carbon Version ^3.8.4 | — | — |
fabricate/events Version ^0.7.0 | — | — |
fabricate/chassis Version ^0.7.0 | — | — |
fabricate/contracts Version ^0.7.0 | — | — |
fabricate/filesystem Version ^0.7.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.