The MIT license, repository tests, changelog, and Dependabot provide useful baseline transparency. Workflow references are unpinned and the repository has no security policy, adding avoidable maintenance and release-hygiene concerns.
47%
Total Score
50
70
75
The package has had only two releases, with the latest about three years ago and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk, despite the short initial 18-day release interval.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months, consistent with the long gap since the latest release. No provided activity signal compensates for this lack of current maintenance.
There were no new or closed issues and no merged pull requests in the last month; one open pull request does not demonstrate sustained maintenance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these counts provide little evidence of an active user or contributor community.
No security policy was found in the linked repository. For a reusable SDK, that weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency and is not compensated by the available tooling signals.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
sammyjo20/saloon Version ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.