Tests, a changelog, a matching repository, and Composer security scanning provide useful transparency. Organization backing and no install scripts reduce operational risk, though the project lacks a security policy and established long-term history.
68%
Total Score
67
100
94
67
The package is only 6 days old, with 10 releases arriving at a median interval of about 35 minutes. That shows active initial development but provides little evidence of sustained maintenance or release stability.
One contributor made all 2 recent commits, concentrating project knowledge in a single person. Organization ownership provides some backing, but no second active contributor is shown.
The repository has only 2 commits in the last 3 months, all within a very new project. Recent activity exists, but the small history does not yet demonstrate sustained maintenance.
No repository security policy was found. This is a transparency gap for reporting vulnerabilities, although the available composer-audit tooling partly offsets broader dependency concerns.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings, and it scopes permissions at job level. However, all 8 action references are unpinned, leaving the workflow exposed to upstream action changes.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.